It can be a bit
gloomy for a liberal living in the Midwest but I was cheered up immensely this
morning by an article about gay marriage in the Indianapolis
Star.
In 2011 the General
Assembly in Indiana approved a amendment which said:
“Only
a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a
marriage in Indiana. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that
of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.”
No surprises there.
But – a new coalition
called “Freedom Indiana” has been formed to fight this amendment – which goes
before the Assembly again in 2014 and – if approved - will then go before voters.
And – here is the
good part – the coalition is supported by some of Indiana’s major businesses – including
Cate’s employer Ducky Pharma. They are doing this on the basis that - with laws
such as this in place they are not able to attract the very best people to
Indianapolis – which in any case is a difficult task given the location and
politics of the city.
Indeed we know personally
of a gay couple who declined to leave Europe for Indianapolis because of the
certain prejudice they would face here.
I just don’t get the
objection to gay marriage. It’s not as though marriage is a finite resource so
that if a gay couple gets hitched – then a heterosexual couple misses out. I think
there is enough to go around.
And – while I
respect the right of other people to not endorse gay marriage – I do not think
that they have the right to deny this type of union – and its attendant
benefits - to a large part of the
population.
But then I don’t
mind either if people vote Republican – as long as we have a Democrat as President.
No comments? Alright, my two cents: Happiness and any blessings, legal or otherwise, loving couples seek.
ReplyDeleteHugs, M. x